Ivan Karaman
Ivan Karaman Reviewed by Ivan Karaman Sampled Jul 16, 2026 48 answers from 4 AI engines
AI visibility audit · supabase.com

Named Everywhere. Linked Almost Nowhere.

Named in buyer answers

85% of 48 answers
named Supabase

That's almost every answers. The honest range is 73–93% (95% confidence), so the true figure is very likely somewhere in there.

4/4

engines named you at least once

3×

your own site was linked as a source. Being named and being cited are counted separately.

https://supabase.com
supabase.com homepage
Loading supabase.com…

AI engines mention Supabase in 85% of buyer questions we sampled — but cite supabase.com as a source in just 3 of 48 answers. Twenty other domains are doing your talking for you.

Engine by engine

Perplexity Loves You. Gemini Is Lukewarm.

ChatGPT

83%

10 of 12 answers named you

range 55–95%

Claude

92%

11 of 12 answers named you

range 65–99%

Gemini

67%

8 of 12 answers named you

range 39–86%

Perplexity

100%

12 of 12 answers named you

range 76–100%

Perplexity strongest · Gemini weakest Grey band = the 95% range (Wilson score)
The receipts

We asked. Here's what came back.

  • Best backend as a service vs Firebase

  • Open source Firebase alternatives for a startup

  • What backend should I use for a SaaS web app

ChatGPT Named Supabase

What backend should I use for a SaaS web app

For most SaaS web apps, a managed Postgres platform like Supabase or Neon plus a framework like Next.js covers 90% of needs. Supabase adds auth, storage, and realtime on top of the database, which shortens time-to-first-customer significantly.

If your team prefers infrastructure-as-code and typed backends, look at Encore or plain Postgres + Prisma on Railway/Fly. Firebase remains a strong pick for mobile-heavy products.

The honest answer: your backend choice matters less than your billing model and retention. Pick the one your team ships fastest on.

ChatGPT Supabase not named

Best backend as a service vs Firebase

Firebase is still the reference BaaS for mobile apps: mature SDKs, offline sync, and tight Google Cloud integration. It struggles most with complex relational queries and cost predictability at scale.

Strong alternatives include AWS Amplify for teams already on AWS, and Appwrite for self-hosted deployments with full data control. For relational workloads, hosted Postgres platforms are worth evaluating — they trade some SDK convenience for a portable data layer.

Match the tool to your data model first, ecosystem second.

The citation gap

The Answers Are About You. The Sources Aren’t.

The sites these 48 answers linked to as sources, and how often.

Supabase was linked 3 times in 48 answers. These got linked instead. Tap one to see what the answers said about it.

AI already believes Supabase is the answer. It just doesn’t believe supabase.com is the source.

Word on the street

The number above is what AI says when nobody mentions you. Here's the rest: where you exist online, what AI says when someone asks for you by name, what people say, and what Google shows for the same questions.

Seen in search

What Google shows for the same questions

AI engines with web search read what ranks. Orange marks a site the AI answers cited too.

Google

Best backend as a service vs Firebase

  1. appwrite.io appwrite.io › blog › post AI cited 3×
    appwrite.io
  2. reddit.com reddit.com › r › FlutterDev AI cited 3×
    reddit.com
  3. api7.ai api7.ai › learning center › api 101 AI cited 3×
    api7.ai
  4. weweb.io weweb.io › blog › supabase vs firebase com AI cited 3×
    weweb.io
  5. youtube.com youtube.com › watch AI cited 6×
    youtube.com
  6. statsig.com statsig.com › blog › top firebase alternative
    statsig.com
  7. mindstudio.ai mindstudio.ai › blog › supabase vs firebase AI cited 3×
    mindstudio.ai
  8. appwrite.io appwrite.io › blog › post AI cited 3×
    appwrite.io
  9. medium.com medium.com › @sergey.prusov › supabase vs firebase vs AI cited 3×
    medium.com

Technical SEO

What the site is built with

  • Next.js CMS

Can AI read you?

2 of 3 need work

  • AI crawlers can read the site

    No AI crawler is blocked in robots.txt.

  • llms.txt

    None yet. A plain summary of what you do, written for AI readers.

  • Structured data (JSON-LD)

    Only Organization, WebSite. Nothing says what you sell or answer.

85

PageSpeed, mobile

Matters for people on your site. No good evidence it changes AI answers, so it isn't scored.

Diagnosis

Why AI skips Supabase

Engines cite what answers the query in one page. For "X vs Y" and "best backend for Z" prompts, the single-page answers live on dev.to, YouTube, and competitor blogs — supabase.com has documentation and marketing, but no citable comparison layer. No llms.txt, no FAQ/HowTo/SoftwareApplication JSON-LD on commercial-intent pages, and the /alternatives and /vs surface area is effectively unclaimed. Third parties filled the vacuum, and every AI citation now compounds their authority on your branded queries.

The one fix that matters most

Publish the definitive first-party comparison layer: supabase.com/vs/firebase (plus /vs/appwrite and /alternatives), structured the way engines cite…

  • 1 Ship llms.txt + llms-full.txt Minutes
  • 2 FAQ + SoftwareApplication JSON-LD on commercial pages Hours
  • 3 Own "Supabase vs Firebase" on your domain Days
  • 4 Answer the pausing-projects complaint, publicly Hours

The exact how-to for each of these, written for your site and platform, is what the fix package delivers.

Get the full plan

Close the gap

I'll write the fixes for Supabase myself.

The fix

$297 one-time

I write the fixes for your site, not a to-do list.

  • A deeper re-run of your audit, with more buyer questions
  • llms.txt and structured data written for your site
  • Ranked fixes with exact steps for your platform
  • A brief for the page AI is most likely to cite
  • A Loom walking you through all of it
  • A re-test once your changes are live

Delivered within 48 hours. No calls.

Not worth it to you? Full refund.

Order the fix · $297

"Ivan was fantastic to work with and extremely knowledgeable. He did an excellent job developing our AEO/GEO and AI search visibility tool. He took over the project after another developer was unable to complete it properly and approached every detail with impressive care and thoroughness as well as going above and beyond. I would highly recommend him."

Scott Melnyk
Scott Melnyk
Founder · 360 Media Consulting

The work behind this page

AI answers read
48
AI answers read

How this was measured

48 answers across 4 engines, sampled Jul 16, 2026. The questions never include your name.

Answers come from the engines' APIs with web search on, not from scraping a chat window. Each engine gets the same questions.

Rates are shown with a 95% range (Wilson score interval), because 5 out of 25 and 50 out of 250 are the same percentage but not the same certainty.

Named means the answer mentions you. Cited means it links your site as a source. They're counted separately, always.

Models

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • Perplexity